When real-life considerations are added, such as 1) including the information content of signals along with 2) the carrier frequencies, and 3) including other toxic stimuli in combination with R.N. Much of this data was obtained under conditions not reflective of real-life. Unfortunately, there is a large body of data from laboratory and epidemiological studies showing that previous and present generations of wireless networking technology have significant adverse health impacts. Wireless radiation offers the promise of improved remote sensing, improved communications and data transfer, and improved connectivity. Epub 2020 Jan 25.Īdverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditionsĬonclusion…”…Superimposing 5G radiation on an already imbedded toxic wireless radiation environment will exacerbate the adverse health effects shown to exist…” The first link is an abstract in PubMed from the National Institute of Health Library of Medicine’s website – this is the US Federal Govt and not some conspiracy site. Here is only one of many references showing published studies showing the hazards of 5G with more to come and more context as well as some information about smart meters that I am giving personal testimony on very soon. There is an insurmountable amount of evidence showing the negative health effects of 900Mhz, 2.4Ghz, 5Ghz and the new 5G (5th Generation), which is around 60GHz, which is only 10s of GHz below the frequency of the military’s directed energy weapons. putting a moratorium on its implementation because there are zero studies showing it is safe. 5G is rapidly gaining mass opposition globally with some countries, cities, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
